Monday 29 December 2014

WHY THEY HAD TO CONCEAL 2000 YEARS BACK THAT JESUS CHRIST LIVED IN INDIA

For most the people all round the world it’s a startling story that Jesus Christ lived in India. People can’t believe that he lived for 120 years and out of this he lived in India for over 100 years. It may be unbelievable for you but it is true and there are enough of evidence to prove this fact. Even church is not in a position to decline this fact so they do maintain a silence about it.
But for me this was not an amazing fact because it is quite obvious that during those “lost years” of Jesus where else he could have been? Where on the earth education and knowledge was available 2000 years back? Knowledge in all forms were available in India at that time. Vedic scriptures, 3500 old Harappan civilization, Yoga, Ayurveda etc. are just a few evidences. Takshshila University in North-Western part (now in Pakistan) existed 2700 years back. Standard of this university was so high that only one out of three aspirants could get admission. Every year 10000 students graduated from here. A faculty of 3000 teachers used to teach subjects like Spiritualism, Vedas, Philosophy, Astronomy, Astrology, Economics, Administration, Yoga and Ayurveda.
For me it was difficult to figure out as to why they had to hide the fact that Jesus lived in India? At that point of time no one had any rivalry against India or its original culture, so why there was a need to conceal the fact that Jesus lived in India? It was this quest which set me into a history exploration mode twenty five years back.
Twenty five years of exploration and investigation revealed to me several astonishing facts about our so called human history. I am very keen to share every unknown and secret portions of my findings in a lucid manner in my forthcoming book “Glories of India” Keep following me for more revelations.

Saturday 27 December 2014

Hindus and Buddhist were being converted



For centuries Hindus and Buddhist were being converted, there was no sound. Now shouting when they are becoming Hindu. Who & Why?
Press & Media lack sensational news after Cong gone elections gone. Now conversion is being sensationalized by them!


Wednesday 24 December 2014

Jesus is not born on Christmas Day as the World Belives

Christmas is a festival which is celebrated most widely all over the world as birth day of Jesus Christ. It is really amazing that how gullible people are. Jesus is most revered  character of the world and he would be No 1 in popularity count. Very few people know that Jesus is not born on December 25th and most people do not know the true life story of Jesus.

History shows that December 25 was popularized as the date for Christmas, not because Christ was born on that day, but because it was already popular in pagan religious celebrations as the birthday of the sun. But could December 25 be the date of Christ's birth?

Early Christian teachers suggested dates all over the calendar. Clement...picked November 18. Hippolytus...figured Christ must have been born on a Wednesday...An anonymous document[,] believed to have been written in North Africa around A.D. 243, placed Jesus's birth on March 28" (Joseph L. Sheler, U.S. News & World Report , "In Search of Christmas," Dec. 23, 1996, p. 58).
A careful analysis of Scripture, however, clearly indicates that December 25 couldn't be the date for Christ's birth. Here are two primary reasons:
First, we know that shepherds were in the fields watching their flocks at the time of Jesus' birth (Luke:2:7-8). Shepherds were not in the fields during December. According to Celebrations: The Complete Book of American Holidays , Luke's account "suggests that Jesus may have been born in summer or early fall. Since December is cold and rainy in Judea, it is likely the shepherds would have sought shelter for their flocks at night" (p. 309).
Similarly, The Interpreter's One-Volume Commentary says this passage argues "against the birth [of Christ] occurring on Dec. 25 since the weather would not have permitted" shepherds watching over their flocks in the fields at night. Second, Jesus' parents came to Bethlehem to register in a Roman census (Luke:2:1-4). Such censuses were not taken in winter, when temperatures often dropped below freezing and roads were in poor condition. Taking a census under such conditions would have been self-defeating.
If Jesus Christ wasn't born on December 25, does the Bible indicate when He was born? The biblical accounts point to the fall of the year as the most likely time of Jesus' birth, based on the conception and birth of John the Baptist.
Since Elizabeth (John's mother) was in her sixth month of pregnancy when Jesus was conceived (Luke:1:24-36), we can determine the approximate time of year Jesus was born if we know when John was born. John's father, Zacharias, was a priest serving in the Jerusalem temple during the course of Abijah (Luke:1:5). Historical calculations indicate this course of service corresponded to June 13-19 in that year ( The Companion Bible , 1974, Appendix 179, p. 200).
It was during this time of temple service that Zacharias learned that he and his wife, Elizabeth, would have a child (Luke:1:8-13). After he completed his service and traveled home, Elizabeth conceived (Luke:1:23-24). Assuming John's conception took place near the end of June, adding nine months brings us to the end of March as the most likely time for John's birth. Adding another six months (the difference in ages between John and Jesus (Luke:1:35-36)) brings us to the end of September as the likely time of Jesus' birth.
Although it is difficult to determine the first time anyone celebrated December 25 as Christmas Day, historians are in general agreement that it was sometime during the fourth century. This is an amazingly late date. Christmas was not observed in Rome, the capital of the Roman Empire, until about 300 years after Christ's death. Its origins cannot be traced back to either the teachings or practices of the earliest Christians.

Thursday 12 June 2014

JANA GANA MANA... WHEN ARE WE GOING TO CHANGE OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM !!
Please keep on forwarding this message till BJP Government takes suitable action.
A controversy is going on for several years about our National Anthem “Jana gana mana”. Actually it seems undoubtedly that “Jana gan mana was written by Kaviguru Rabindra Nath Tagore in praise to King George V in 1911. 
But it is natural for the people who have patronized this praised song since 1911,  to give justification for adopting it and to continue till date. They should not  say that they prefer to flatter the British and it is quite understandable that they would raise a controversy as a plea to  their defense.
Enough is enough. More than 64 years we have tolerated such insult to our Motherland India through a verse which pronounces highest degree of our slavery to the British rule. 
To-day our poets would love to create a worthy national anthem for our great nation. Let’s have a nationwide competition and allow every citizen an opportunity to compose a verse. The best one should be selected by a committee appointed by the Government for the purpose.
Now, let’s go beyond the controversy and try to understand the inherent message. Please read it carefully and observe what comes to your mind. Simple knowledge of Hindi is sufficient  to decide whether the verse is referred (i) Praise to King George V (ii) Praise of God or (iii) Glory of India.



जन गण मन अधिनायक जय हे
भारत भाग्यविधाता
पंजाब सिन्धु गुजरात मराठा
द्राविड़ उत्कल बंगा
विन्ध्य हिमाचल यमुना गंगा
उच्छल जलधि तरंगा
तव शुभ नामे जागे
तव शुभ आशीष मागे
गाहे तव जयगाथा
जन गण मंगलदायक जय हे
भारत भाग्यविधाता
जय हेजय हेजय हे
जय जय जय जय हे!


Jana gana mana adhi naayaka jaya hai!
Bhaarat bhaagya vidhaata
Punjab Sindh Gujarat Maraatha,
Dravid Utkala Bangaa.
Vindhya Himachala Yamuna Ganga,
Uchhala jaladhi taranga.
Tava shubh naame jaage,
Tava shubh aashish maage,
Gahe tava jaya-gaatha.

Jana-gana-mangaladayaka jaya hai!
Bharat bhagya vidhata.
Jaya hai! Jaya hai! Jaya hai!
Jaya Jaya Jaya Jaya hai!

The following translation (edited in 1950 to replace Sindh with Sindhu as Sindh after partition was allocated to Pakistan), attributed to Tagore, is provided by the Government of India's national portal:[9] http://india.gov.in/knowindia/national_symbols.php?id=6
Thou art the ruler of the minds of all people,
Dispenser of India's destiny.
Thy name rouses the hearts of Punjab, Sindhu, Gujarat andMaratha,
Of the Dravida, Utkala and Bengal;
It echoes in the hills of the Vindhyas and Himalayas,
mingles in the music of Yamuna and Ganga and is
chanted by the waves of the Indian Ocean.
They pray for thy blessings and sing thy praise.
The saving of all people waits in thy hand,
Thou dispenser of India's destiny.
Victory, victory, victory to thee.

JANA GANA MANA... WHEN ARE WE GOING TO CHANGE OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM.

Please keep on forwarding this message till BJP Government takes suitable action.

A controversy is going on for several years about our National Anthem “Jana gana mana” actually it seems that there is no doubt that “Jana gan mana was written by Kaviguru Sri Rabindra Nath Tagore in praise to King George V in 1911. 
But it is natural for the people who have patronized this praise song since 1911,  to give justification for adopting it and to continue till date. They cannot say that they preferred to flatter British and it is quite understandable that they would raise a controversy as a weapon for their defense.
Enough is enough. More than 64 years we have tolerated insult to our Motherland India through a verse which pronounces highest degree of our slavery to British rule. 
To-day our poets would love to create a worthy national anthem for our great nation. Let’s have a nationwide competition and allow every citizen an opportunity to compose a verse. The best one should be selected by a committee appointed by the Government.
Now, let’s go beyond the controversy and try to understand the inherent message. Please read it carefully and observe what comes to your mind. Simple knowledge of Hindi is sufficient for you to decide whether following verse is (i) Praise to King George V (ii) Praise of God or (iii) Glory of India.


जन गण मन अधिनायक जय हे
भारत भाग्यविधाता
पंजाब सिन्धु गुजरात मराठा
द्राविड़ उत्कल बंगा
विन्ध्य हिमाचल यमुना गंगा
उच्छल जलधि तरंगा
तव शुभ नामे जागे
तव शुभ आशीष मागे
गाहे तव जयगाथा

जन गण मंगलदायक जय हे
भारत भाग्यविधाता
जय हे, जय हे, जय हे
जय जय जय जय हे!


Jana gana mana adhi naayaka jaya hai!
Bhaarat bhaagya vidhaata
Punjab Sindh Gujarat Maraatha,
Dravid Utkala Bangaa.
Vindhya Himachala Yamuna Ganga,
Uchhala jaladhi taranga.
Tava shubh naame jaage,
Tava shubh aashish maage,
Gahe tava jaya-gaatha.

Jana-gana-mangaladayaka jaya hai!
Bharat bhagya vidhata.
Jaya hai! Jaya hai! Jaya hai!
Jaya Jaya Jaya Jaya hai!

The following translation (edited in 1950 to replace Sindh with Sindhu as Sindh after partition was allocated to Pakistan), attributed to Tagore, is provided by the Government of India's national portal:[9] http://india.gov.in/knowindia/national_symbols.php?id=6
Thou art the ruler of the minds of all people,
Dispenser of India's destiny.
Thy name rouses the hearts of Punjab, Sindhu, Gujarat andMaratha,
Of the Dravida, Utkala and Bengal;
It echoes in the hills of the Vindhyas and Himalayas,
mingles in the music of Yamuna and Ganga and is
chanted by the waves of the Indian Ocean.
They pray for thy blessings and sing thy praise.
The saving of all people waits in thy hand,
Thou dispenser of India's destiny.
Victory, victory, victory to thee.

Thursday 5 June 2014

Why do we Speak English with fellow Indians? Learn from Modi!

Let's Learn from Narendra Modi

Why do we speak in English with Fellow Indians

First of all I must confess that I can not type Hindi (Like Millions of Hindi speakers in India) and I feel ashamed to write this post in English any way I assure you that soon I will learn to type Hindi because time has now come that English will get its right place.

All my acquaintances know that I do not speak in English with an Indian unless he does not understand Hindi or Bengali.

English has been very cunningly & forcibly imposed on us by Britishers. All of us know this fact, so why are we unable to do away with this funny and difficult language at least in our conversation.

If spoken English is  simpler than Indian languages, we can consider to accept it. But it is a very difficult language having more exception than rules. Rules and usage are phonetically quite complicated. In Hindi there are 55 alphabets but poor English has to manage all the sounds with only 26 letters. One has to practically learn and remember sound and spelling of each and every word. But in Hindi it is simple. You pronounce as you write and writing also has no tricks like English, no silent letters etc.

I don't see why we should converse in English, may be some  think it is a superior language and want to show others that they are superior class of people.

Let all the sensible Indians make a pledge that we shall converse between us in Hindi or other Indian languages. All of our languages are much richer and expressive than English. We should give up our tendency to use English when we go to airport and fly, when we go to a posh restaurant and talk to waiters or when we speak to a telephone operator or tele-callers.

We must bring about change and break away with a language which reminds us of our slavery. WE CAN - WE WILL DO IT



Tuesday 3 June 2014

WE EXPECT BJP GOVERNMENT TO WORK SERIOUSLY ON TRUE HISTORY OF THE WORLD CIVILIZATION.

WE EXPECT BJP GOVERNMENT TO WORK SERIOUSLY ON TRUE HISTORY OF THE WORLD CIVILIZATION.

It's Time for you to know the reasons for the falsification of history

History is important. It does not only speak of past but it makes foundation for our future.

It is a matter of real disbelief that billions of people in this world have known the false and fabricated history for at least two centuries. True history of human civilization and source of all the cultures in the world has been concealed and put behind a thick curtain. Whatever history is being taught all over the world is false and based on false premise.

The question on true history of civilization arose in my mind about 28 years back, I had joined Brahma Kumaris to learn meditation and spiritual wisdom. The foundation of their knowledge is that we humans were highly civilized 5000 years back and now we are uncivilized. I found this philosophy difficult to accept. Like many, I was also taught that man and his civilization has evolved through millions of years, we have developed from apes, monkeys and animal like living to our present so called advanced society.

Since then I started examining their theory vis-a-vis the theory of evolution of world culture and civilization. In my search for truth I studied hundreds of books, articles and blogs. I met several historians and visited several historical sites in India and abroad. More deeper I went, I was getting more and more astounding results... and still a long way to go!

I would like to share thousands of stories  with you which will give you startling facts. I really don't understand where to begin and what should be the sequence. So it is best that I share in small bits as and when it comes to my mind.

An average Indian thinks that "India is a great nation which has given religions like Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism and Sikhism to the world. India has given Mathematics, Astronomy etc. etc. Indians are holding key positions in the world... these are just tip of the ice berg. Contribution of India in the culture and civilization of the world is not known more than five percent. Take a small example that  Christianity is the largest religion in the world, Jesus Christ is the most revered and popular character in the world, but it is not known to many that Jesus did all his education in India between 13 to 29 years of age. He preached only for three years in west. After crucifixion he did not die and came back to India. He died in Kashmir at the age of 120. His tomb is there at Sri Nagar, Khanyar, Rozabal area.

Abraham went to west from India, Moses is buried in Kashmir. All the world religions and cultures have their roots in Vedic culture which is practiced in India till to-day. Sanskrit is Mother of all languages in the world. It is purely a Vedic language and it is wrongly publicized that it is an Indo-European language.

Rediscovering the true history is a big task and it is not at all possible for an individual like me to do justice. An all out effort is required from all sensible citizens and Government in particular.

I have written a letter to this effect to our beloved Prime Minister Sri Narendra Modi and also to Smt Smriti Z. Irani, the minister for Human Resource Development. I am confident that this nationalist Government will give due importance to this matter.


I seek your support in this National mission in whatever manner you can. Let's make it a Movement and share it through Facebook and Twitter. Ensure that you circulate it wherever you CAN.

I shall be glad to share more with you and look forward to your support. Please let me know about your support which will ignite more fire within me.